Delta-1035 wrote:This pack is getting better and better!

i second that and maybe in future we see Forcemaster´s Venator and you´re Invisible Hand in a battle on a map

naru1305 wrote:

Delta-1035 wrote:This pack is getting better and better!

i second that and maybe in future we see Forcemaster´s Venator and you´re Invisible Hand in a battle on a map

who says i want also be making a venator

I actuly dont think you should make a venater. Forcemasters will probably be unbeatable, have you seen the WIP thread?

THEWULFMAN wrote:I actuly dont think you should make a venater. Forcemasters will probably be unbeatable, have you seen the WIP thread?

yes i have and i also know its a TCW style venator not a movie style....

maxloef wrote:

THEWULFMAN wrote:I actuly dont think you should make a venater. Forcemasters will probably be unbeatable, have you seen the WIP thread?

yes i have and i also know its a TCW style venator not a movie style....

True: If you want go make a movie style venater go right ahead its your desicion not mine. I was just telling mo. I love your work max, I really do, I just like TCW style better. imo.

But I would like to see a movie like venator since I don't like TCW.

Out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?

Jendo7 wrote:Out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?

good question

Jendo7 wrote:Out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?

a cartoony lame style and realistic style? like the whole cartoon series?

True, the movie style is better.

maxloef wrote:

Jendo7 wrote:Out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?

a cartoony lame style and realistic style? like the whole cartoon series?

Honestly? It looks pretty realistic to me. The vehicles are one of the least stylized parts of the cartoon; they look pretty identical in scale and detail to the movie versions. And the comment "lame style and realistic style" is borderline "pfft no, I'm not going to do a lame version like that other person's doing, I'm the man." There's room to do the same thing as someone else and still respect the work.

So the invisible hand will be the same size as the original stock version? and interiors? AWSOME!

maxloef wrote:

Jendo7 wrote:Out of curiosity, what's the difference between the two?

a cartoony lame style and realistic style? like the whole cartoon series?

That's a matter of opinion, even though i've never watched the show I'd say it's an interesting and unique art style.

Even TCW style FM's Venator looks more movie-like than the stock BF2 version. Found that, provided the UV's are suited for it you can generally make FM's models pretty realistic with a retexturing job.

On another note, great pack so far, if you're considering making pirate/mercenary stuff at some point these could be nice:
From top to bottom:
Dagger (not sure why it's purple...)
Dianoga
Morningstar

Maveritchell wrote: Honestly? It looks pretty realistic to me.

sorry but i dont agree on that, i think his work is impressive very impressive, im just not a big fan of TCW, some things just look over cartoonified, especial stuff like the AAT.

maxloef wrote:

Maveritchell wrote: Honestly? It looks pretty realistic to me.

sorry but i dont agree on that, i think his work is impressive very impressive, im just not a big fan of TCW, some things just look over cartoonified, especial stuff like the AAT.

The AAT is one of the rare things I don't really like in TCW, the AT-TE for example is excellent (especially the animation of it walking).

I don't see what's "over cartoonified" on ForceMaster's Venator tho.

Just wanted to say.

well its mostly the colors IMO, but toe ach his own ofcourse

a invisible hand hanger update

That looks really good!

Ooooh, nice colors there.

Most impressive, and you are a Jedi!

Seriously though, that is really amazing.

Jendo7 wrote:Most impressive, and you are a Jedi!

Ya mean me?