U_U I'm very confused. Then, can or can't to put the ship sideway?

AhsokaTano wrote:U_U I'm very confused. Then, can or can't to put the ship sideway?

Let's put it simply. No, you can not.

Ok, thanks to all for answering my question

AhsokaTano wrote:U_U I'm very confused. Then, can or can't to put the ship sideway?

That's the third time you've asked that. Your answer:

AhsokaTano wrote:I put the ship sideway:

Hidden/Spoiler:

[hide]
But in the game the ship looks there:
[hide]

Yes, you can. You even demonstrated it with your screenshots, did you not?

If you actually meant the gravity, that question was immediately answered after you made this thread. Posters may go off on a tangent to talk about a related topic in a thread of yours, but it doesn't necessarily mean that they are referring to your problem or you, such as all the posts that came after your second post in this thread.

For future reference, to avoid multiple instances of confusion on your part, the best thing to do is to understand the context of posts via dissection.

Fiodis wrote:

Dakota wrote:

Fiodis wrote:The actual hangar and its vehicles and any units inside it would show up way off the map, then. Not to mention you wouldn't see any units inside the fake hangar from the outside if you looked in. No, there's just no way to make this work even halfway properly.

i told u it would be crude. you could add vehecals into the fake hanger and you could try to mask the vehecals off the map by lod changing, fog, an extra sky box around it.

I did notice you said it would be crude. By "map" I meant the one that shows when you press the map key in-game.

We can actually come up with pseudo-workarounds for a lot of things, but if they're crude and complicated they're not much different from accepting that it isn't feasable or possible without so much discussion.

ok, but the part with the ships on the map display is easy, you could just edit the odfs of the ships to take away their icons on the map.

lol, the icons are the absolute least problem.
the point is: there is no way to do it properly so ist not necessary to discuss what else wouldhave to be done if it was possible...

DarthD.U.C.K. wrote:the point is: there is no way to do it properly so ist not necessary to discuss what else wouldhave to be done if it was possible...

Thank you; I couldn't (and didn't) say it better myself.