-= Gametoast.com =-

I have done some research and apparently a Guild Wars two is under production. I don't usually like MMO's but I found Guild Wars quite entertaining. I was just wondering if anyone had any info on this new production. The Guild Wars team appears to be keeping their mouths shut tight! So I, personally, haven't come across any reliable info.

delta578 wrote:I have done some research and apparently a Guild Wars two is under production.

delta578 wrote:So I, personally, haven't come across any reliable info.

These pretty much contradict each other. Try waiting until anything official comes out, or at the very least, giveus the sources of your "unreliable" information.

Frisbeetarian wrote:

delta578 wrote:I have done some research and apparently a Guild Wars two is under production.

delta578 wrote:So I, personally, haven't come across any reliable info.

These pretty much contradict each other. Try waiting until anything official comes out, or at the very least, giveus the sources of your "unreliable" information.

Mostly it was just googleing the subject, but I have only found some "what we want" posts and forums. I merely posted this topic to see if anyone had had better luck!

What we want posts have no indication what so ever that the game is actually in production.

It has been officially announced and has it's own logo. THe reason that they haven't said much is because they want it to be a surprise. http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Guild_Wars_2

Wikipedia isn't always correct and anyone could make a logo, for example my avatar.

That's not Wikipedia, so generally, I would trust it less, but if you look further down the page, you'll see the External Links with plenty of trusted references.

Frisbeetarian wrote:That's not Wikipedia, so generally, I would trust it less, but if you look further down the page, you'll see the External Links with plenty of trusted references.

Be that as it may, the point of this topic isn't argue over who has the best sources I merely posted this to see if anyone had had any better luck finding info on it I don't see the crime here.

delta578 wrote:

Frisbeetarian wrote:That's not Wikipedia, so generally, I would trust it less, but if you look further down the page, you'll see the External Links with plenty of trusted references.

Be that as it may, the point of this topic isn't argue over who has the best sources I merely posted this to see if anyone had had any better luck finding info on it I don't see the crime here.

There was no argument; I suggest you read what was written and put it in context.

the first one was ok, but it got boring after a while

they better make it more interesting