Zelda Timeline EXTREME SPOILER WARNING!!!! (sorry for caps.)
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 10:35 am
Before I begin to get on-topic here I have to warn you that this is NOT the topic you want to see if you don't want spoilers for any Zelda-game!
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... mv&pl=game
I found this a while ago (and Rekubot reminded me about it just a moment ago) and it seems like a good theory of the Zelda timeline but what do you think about the Zelda-timeline? Do you think this is a good theory? I like it anyway but I'll change it a little to make it fit better (well, in my brain anyway).
Edit: You will not understand a thing of this if you have'nt watched that vid.
The beginning of the timeline seems good with OoT and Minish Cap and it looks really good further on too, but I don't see how it fits that Ganon would'nt have been sealed away in "Hyrule A"... After all one of the main things in "A link to the past" is Ganon trying to break the seal..
And I think the Oracle-games would both fit better at the end of "Hyrule A" instead of one at each timeline.
And what to do with TP? I'm almost sure it fits best just where these guys put it, between WW (Wind Waker) and OoT. ("Hyrule B") Why?: After the events of OoT Hyrule city is ruined and the Hylians move somewhere else (Hyrule Market in TP) and some new people move to a place not so far from the ruins of the old Hyrule City, the ordonians. And with the Temple of Time ruined the Master Sword rests in its little stone in the Faron Woods... Ganon (he really dies, right?) somehow resurrects himself some time after TP and the Master Sword is moved to the place it is in WW (under Hyrule Castle) so the Royal Family easier can help the hero get the Master Sword. But since no hero comes, the gods are forced to drown Hyrule and so the sea of WW is born..
Hope anything of what I write makes any sense at all... What are your theories about this?
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... mv&pl=game
I found this a while ago (and Rekubot reminded me about it just a moment ago) and it seems like a good theory of the Zelda timeline but what do you think about the Zelda-timeline? Do you think this is a good theory? I like it anyway but I'll change it a little to make it fit better (well, in my brain anyway).
Edit: You will not understand a thing of this if you have'nt watched that vid.
The beginning of the timeline seems good with OoT and Minish Cap and it looks really good further on too, but I don't see how it fits that Ganon would'nt have been sealed away in "Hyrule A"... After all one of the main things in "A link to the past" is Ganon trying to break the seal..
And I think the Oracle-games would both fit better at the end of "Hyrule A" instead of one at each timeline.
And what to do with TP? I'm almost sure it fits best just where these guys put it, between WW (Wind Waker) and OoT. ("Hyrule B") Why?: After the events of OoT Hyrule city is ruined and the Hylians move somewhere else (Hyrule Market in TP) and some new people move to a place not so far from the ruins of the old Hyrule City, the ordonians. And with the Temple of Time ruined the Master Sword rests in its little stone in the Faron Woods... Ganon (he really dies, right?) somehow resurrects himself some time after TP and the Master Sword is moved to the place it is in WW (under Hyrule Castle) so the Royal Family easier can help the hero get the Master Sword. But since no hero comes, the gods are forced to drown Hyrule and so the sea of WW is born..
Hope anything of what I write makes any sense at all... What are your theories about this?