Page 54 of 99

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:35 pm
by genaral_mitch
The Nasal Abyss wrote:
B.I.G_Cookie wrote:remade my 501st legion trooper.
ive also tried to get movie like battle damage based on this reference
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
skin
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
Image
cleanImage
You have yet to realize that if a clone had battle damage, that would insinuate that he has been shot. If a clone were shot, he'd be dead.

The black and white stuff you are seeing on your reference are scuffs and scratches. Nothing more. Your skins have been bothering me because they have so much stuff on them, and it really distracts me from the other elements in a skin, like recoloring. They are too dirty. There is a fine line (of course, in my opinion, like eveything else in this post) between just enough dirty, and WAY too much dirty. You cross this line in most of your skins so far.

There, it's finally out of my system. I am by no means meaning no offense in this post, so please don't take it as such. I am just providing my outlook on your artwork, even if it does sound a little on the harsh side.
I've heard a lot of things about battle damage, but i never knew people meant it as muh as this. Anyway, my oppinois of the skin is it looks good. I like damage.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:39 pm
by ArkAngel
The Nasal Abyss wrote:
B.I.G_Cookie wrote:remade my 501st legion trooper.
ive also tried to get movie like battle damage based on this reference
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
skin
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
Image
cleanImage
You have yet to realize that if a clone had battle damage, that would insinuate that he has been shot. If a clone were shot, he'd be dead.

The black and white stuff you are seeing on your reference are scuffs and scratches. Nothing more. Your skins have been bothering me because they have so much stuff on them, and it really distracts me from the other elements in a skin, like recoloring. They are too dirty. There is a fine line (of course, in my opinion, like eveything else in this post) between just enough dirty, and WAY too much dirty. You cross this line in most of your skins so far.

There, it's finally out of my system. I am by no means meaning no offense in this post, so please don't take it as such. I am just providing my outlook on your artwork, even if it does sound a little on the harsh side.
Well, the skin was made to HAVE battle damage. Of course, if every skin had battle damage they would look terrible, but he was experimenting with it. Just because it's dirty doesn't mean you get shot. I run cross country and track & field, and by the end of both seasons, my shoes are dirty, but I didn't get shot (I hope xD). We've had this debate bajillions of times, and it always comes down to this: Dirt's okay in certain cases, just not all the time.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:01 pm
by The Nasal Abyss
ArkAngel wrote:
Well, the skin was made to HAVE battle damage. Of course, if every skin had battle damage they would look terrible, but he was experimenting with it. Just because it's dirty doesn't mean you get shot. I run cross country and track & field, and by the end of both seasons, my shoes are dirty, but I didn't get shot (I hope xD). We've had this debate bajillions of times, and it always comes down to this: Dirt's okay in certain cases, just not all the time.
There is a difference between getting dirty and having battle damage. Getting dirty is collecting dirt and scuffs. Battle damage, on the other hand (as Big Cookie means it) is pretty much canonically impossible. Lasers divert their energy throughout soft bodies, enough energy to kill anyone.

There hasn't been one of his posts that I have seen that doesn't have a "dirty" version that looks a lot worse than what it should because of over-excesive use of grey and brown colors. Heck, look at the stock skins for example.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:05 pm
by ArkAngel
Battle damage doesn't JUST mean that's its laser fire, obviously said clone would be dead. You can clearly see there aren't any blaster marks, he's just showing the battle damage (i.e. scrapes, chipping paint on armor, dirt, etc.). If you're taking cover behind a rock for example, you may scuff the armor. If there was no battle, there wouldn't be any scuffs or dirt. Thus it's battle damage lol. Stuff happens. We could argue all day about potential scenarios, but to be frank I don't really want to.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:11 pm
by Manny18Ply
ArkAngel wrote:
Manny18Ply wrote:
ArkAngel wrote:yo, gotta add the chestplate markings. I like the shoulder design though.
i got the desighn :P
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
By manny18ply at 2010-01-26
noo bro check out wookiepedia lol http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Coruscant_Guard
YEah but i just wanted to do something simple :P

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
by SW_elite
Mate, those arent air holes on his helmet. I just make stuff up cause everything has preety much been done allready, and since you lot didnt really seem to like my new skin, i would like to ask what you look for in a good skin?

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:52 pm
by Nihillo
SW_elite wrote:Mate, those arent air holes on his helmet. I just make stuff up cause everything has preety much been done allready, and since you lot didnt really seem to like my new skin, i would like to ask what you look for in a good skin?
Oh, don't worry about what you should do to make your skin likeable; do whatever you want to.

As for their reaction, well, 90% of the skins in this thread are clones, so I guess we have all grown rather uninterested in them (except for those of us who... overreact). Personally, I like the design that you used, it's something new.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:55 pm
by SW_elite
Thanks!!! :)

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:51 pm
by ArkAngel
sorry SW_Elite, sometimes things get overlooked. I checked it out, and it's certainly creative :D. In my opinion, the markings look great, but the helmet without anything in the middle looks kinda boring. Everything else is cool though :)

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:03 am
by Executer94
Here is one of my skins for my upcoming map

Sorry my skin skills are not very good.
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:06 am
by Deviss
Executer94 wrote:Here is one of my skins for my upcoming map

Sorry my skin skills are not very good.
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
nice droid :wink:

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:06 am
by Master_Ben
Actually, that's quite impressive, I like it! :thumbs:

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:07 am
by Executer94
thanks :D

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:58 pm
by KnightsFan
Dunno how good this is... but it can't hurt too bad to post it.
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:01 pm
by Fiodis
It's so-so, I suppose. Why are his shoes orange-striped? And that star-thing, it looks too smeared to be a mark but too regular to be a battle wound (right over the heart, too).

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:10 pm
by KnightsFan
His shoes are muddy (or that's what I attempted :P).

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:16 pm
by ArkAngel
IMO get rid of the shoe thing, star, and the numbers

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:35 pm
by Fiodis
The stripes on the shoes are orange.

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:28 pm
by Coley
Yes the shoes seems a bit weird.
But I like the star xD

Re: Glamour Skins, Edition VII

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:32 pm
by Manny18Ply
Phase 1 185th trooper
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
By manny18ply at 2010-01-29
Image
By manny18ply at 2010-01-29
Image
By manny18ply at 2010-01-29