tsurugi13 wrote:

Teancum wrote:

Raptor522 wrote:. . .there's no way to actually know the gameplay was better. I'd be willing to place bets that the gameplay was exactly the same... just "prettier."

Which would have been fine by me.

Agree... there's a reason guru started this website, and it's not because BF2 was an ok game.

You're absolutely right, it's because SWBF1 was an ok game (ok technically it was made before that, but the point is that it's been around since before SWBF2).

Maveritchell wrote:

tsurugi13 wrote:

Teancum wrote:

Raptor522 wrote:. . .there's no way to actually know the gameplay was better. I'd be willing to place bets that the gameplay was exactly the same... just "prettier."

Which would have been fine by me.

Agree... there's a reason guru started this website, and it's not because BF2 was an ok game.

You're absolutely right, it's because SWBF1 was an ok game (ok technically it was made before that, but the point is that it's been around since before SWBF2).

Yeah, I definitely remember this place way before we really cared about a sequel to SWBF 1...

I should rephrase what I'm trying to say. I'm making it sound like it's a bad series; I'm not trying to say that. I'm just saying it's waaay short of it's potential, and I just don't want it to continue to fail to be nearly as awesome at it could be. Did I word that one right?

But I hope the gameplay is better because it would suck if it was a replica of SWBF2 with only a few things added/changed.

Locking this for now since we're back to no news

Staff, feel free to unlock this if any notable news comes along.