Page 89 of 99

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:33 am
by CodaRez
Lozza wrote:
CodaRez wrote:
Lozza wrote:the reason why I didn't like Codarez's model ( well I do like it, I mean... just you know) is because it removed half of the tactical stuff on it
Hah?

Whats those, I kept all accessories from the stock E11 intact, and then some.
Ok, I'm confused....

But doesn't it look like this?
Hidden/Spoiler:
Image
*facepalm*
[color=#BF0000]CodaRez says scrolling is beautiful[/color] wrote:E-11 Blaster Rifle (1st person model)

This uses the 1st-person stock model of the E-11, which i tweaked, filling some holes

Image

-trust me when i say the quality over the usual 3rd person stock model is superior

-highlight, that there are spokes on it now (normally when imported the spokes degrade to a single one in the middle of the barrel)
The beautiful device known as the scroller is an innovation no?
Scroll down the topic and u woulda seen this, now was that so hard?

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:37 am
by Lozza
CodaRez wrote:The beautiful device known as the scroller is an innovation no?
Scroll down the topic and u woulda seen this, now was that so hard?
But it says '1st' person model, that means like CoD views, Don't you mean 3rd person.
I'm not an idiot, stop making me sound like one, if you know your correct, then just slowly explain it to me instead of making smart remarks like 'The beautiful device known as the scroller'. : | And if your gonna be like that, why would I download it anyway.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:14 am
by mswf
This stuff was out of line, I apologize to everyone, I really don't want to be like this. Sorry.
Hidden/Spoiler:
[quote="Lozza"]But it says '1st' person model, that means like CoD views, Don't you mean 3rd person.[/quote]
No, you idiot. It means that he took the 1st person model from SWBFII, that was more detailed, and then added geometry where it was missing, because the 1st person model was optimized for, well, 1st person.
[quote="Lozza"]I'm not an idiot, stop making me sound like one, if you know your correct, then just slowly explain it to me instead of making smart remarks like 'The beautiful device known as the scroller'. : |[/quote]
It's a tradition here to be sarcastic, idiot.
see, I just did it again
Lozza wrote:And if your gonna be like that, why would I download it anyway.
Because using the JKA model is a clear violation of the Gametoast policy, like Teancum, our admin, just pointed out here.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:06 am
by CodaRez
Lozza wrote: I'm not an idiot, stop making me sound like one, if you know your correct, then just slowly explain it to me instead of making smart remarks like 'The beautiful device known as the scroller'. : | And if your gonna be like that, why would I download it anyway.
Well sry, I aint normally like this, but trust me, there have been higher sarcastic flights of fancy than the one I gave you. Grateful u should be :wink: . Considering the blunder u did, that I bet even you can laugh on urself if u just look back.
mswf wrote: Because using the JKA model is a clear violation of the Gametoast policy, like Teancum, our admin, just pointed out here.
Apparently its not, since if u look closely, the link Dev gave says 'Hapslash', so its a custom model, and custom model it are, custom model it legal.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:22 am
by Lozza
CodaRez wrote:
Lozza wrote: I'm not an idiot, stop making me sound like one, if you know your correct, then just slowly explain it to me instead of making smart remarks like 'The beautiful device known as the scroller'. : | And if your gonna be like that, why would I download it anyway.
Well sry, I aint normally like this, but trust me, there have been higher sarcastic flights of fancy than the one I gave you. Grateful u should be :wink: . Considering the blunder u did, that I bet even you can laugh on urself if u just look back.
mswf wrote: Because using the JKA model is a clear violation of the Gametoast policy, like Teancum, our admin, just pointed out here.
Apparently its not, since if u look closely, the link Dev gave says 'Hapslash', so its a custom model, and custom model it are, custom model it legal.
Ohk, truce
Hidden/Spoiler:
rrrrrrrrr, I can't say anything anymore, without poo happening, is it just me... yes it is : (

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:24 am
by Maveritchell
mswf wrote:No, you idiot.
It's a tradition here to be sarcastic, idiot.
It's not a tradition here to be rude, and when sarcasm crosses the line into being rude, you're breaking the rules. I don't care how frustrated you get with someone, when you start calling them names you are stepping across the line. Don't do it, next time it's a warning.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:57 am
by Slime615
mswf, that was uncalled for! You have acted like that to me before as well. Is it not natural that somebody should read 1st person, and assume that it meant 1st person? I think he has a valid point! I assumed the same thing when I first looked at it!

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:01 pm
by Fusion
Stop trying to start another fight.

Any more of this, warnings will be issued.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:16 pm
by Deviss
Coda is right it is HapSlash custom E-11 i converted it many time ago so is llegal :) (also is much better than stock jka also use less textures :P)

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:08 pm
by mswf
Deviss wrote:Coda is right it is HapSlash custom E-11 i converted it many time ago so is llegal :) (also is much better than stock jka also use less textures :P)
I do not mean illegal, but more like "not supposed to" according to that policy.

And my apologies, Lozza. I tried to express my point to you, but I completely failed at that. I used that word way too many times, so that I sounded childish, so was that action itself.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:15 pm
by Slime615
I Need a realy big favour! Could someone make a Msh, for a MALE Torgrunta? I would use shaak ti, but she is VERY clearly female.... I appreciate this!

Also, Could someone make me a Clean Clone Commando skin? I have a white one, but it is dirty... so a clean one would be great for skining!

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:40 pm
by Deviss
Slime615 wrote:Also, Could someone make me a Clean Clone Commando skin? I have a white one, but it is dirty... so a clean one would be great for skining!
you say for neomarz jka commando ? because labj made one ;)

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:11 pm
by mswf
Here's a link to B.I.G_Cookie's white clone commando skin:
http://www.gametoast.com/forums/viewtop ... 64&t=18530

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:21 pm
by RogueKnight
mswf wrote:Here's a link to B.I.G_Cookie's white clone commando skin:
http://www.gametoast.com/forums/viewtop ... 64&t=18530
He already has that one.
Slime615 wrote:I have a white one, but it is dirty... so a clean one would be great for skinning!

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:23 pm
by mswf
RogueKnight wrote:
mswf wrote:Here's a link to B.I.G_Cookie's white clone commando skin:
http://www.gametoast.com/forums/viewtop ... 64&t=18530
He already has that one.
Slime615 wrote:I have a white one, but it is dirty... so a clean one would be great for skinning!
Oops, I misunderstood his post.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:40 am
by SW_elite
From my post before, I need models to be exported to msh format, but the format I had them in is clearly making it a lot harder for anyone to do me that favor. So would it make any difference if I exported to OBJ, or something similar?

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:38 am
by skelltor
i have a request can somone reuplode or send me a link to darth D.U.C.K.s fixed remapped heavy trooper i know he put it up here some where but file front was not working for me then and i frogot to bookmark the page.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:48 pm
by AgentSmith_#27
I know this is a huge task, but I'm (and I know of a few others that could also benefit) making a medieval map, and have a horse model (4k polies but still looks nice) that needs to be set up as a walker, or at least textured properly (too complex for me to handle) if anyone wants to do all the work of like making a new skeleton and anims and all that, or if you would be willing to texture it, PM me.

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:18 am
by Lozza
I know this argument is long gong now, I just want to say, what was the point of what you said mswf? Cause instead of learning something from your reply, the only thing I learn't was that I'm an idiot.... 2 times, according to you. In the end the whole point of an argument was just us trying to prove our point, if we disagree, we disagree, but in our minds we know we have won. And about sarcasm being a 'tradition'. That makes no sense, so really your tradition is to be rude? I hope its no one elses.

I'm going to refer it to something today when a year 12 girl was making a speech in front of the whole school, she made a joke that wasn't funny and some rude person laughed sarcastically and I knew that she was completely put off in her speech and she slowly got worse and worse in her language fluent-ness. Sarcasm is not nice, unless its sarcasm is in-

Kinda Good:
'Your so not annoying : )' (but the person really is)

Bad:
'Hey! Did you know there is such thing as a KEYBOARD! You press the letter buttons to reply with your answer! Keep that in mind next time!' (because the person didn't reply)

The 'bad' one was just MEAN, it doesn't feel mean when you write it but the person who reads it feels really bad.

So please, that conversation was me and Codarez's. Leave it to us, it was alright until you started proving 'your' point to me. Codarez didn't know what he was thinking (I hope) when he said that sarcastic thing, so yeah, I never really make sense, but hopefully this text did.

EDIT: To admins- Mswf and I settled this through PM, sorry for starting about it again, we gewd now :)

Thankyou. :thumbs:

:stormie:

Re: All-Purpose Request Thread (Take 3)

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:48 am
by SW_elite
Wow, thats the most intelligent thing I've heard you say :) <<< Sarcasim :P