Wow, care to kick everyone here in the junk again? --and by the way, the Convo Pack doesn't change anything you mentioned.Commander_Cody771 wrote:Yes Battlefield 2 and BF 2142 are equally good. I mean please, NOTHING in the universe of objects in SWBF 2 are movable. You set of a grenade near one and it stands still as if nothing happened. Gameplay is also not good at ALL. I mean it is some but the sprinting. You can go 3 miles doing a sprint jump as a regular soldier. I mean it doesn't even physics. The only reason I still play this game is cause of the convo pack and plan to make a mod that changes all of the above.
Comparing SWBF2 to the Battlefield games isn't really fair. They're the same type of game, but SWBF2 is geared as an arcade-ish game, whereas the Battlefield games are much more simulation. Personally I don't want all the simulation stuff. Keep gameplay simple and inviting. I just can't get into a game that worries about getting the exact specs of a real rifle into a game. Give me a game that has slightly "cheesy" gameplay, as that's MUCH more fun to me personally.
SWBF2 is also a year older than Battlefield 2, that's a big difference when it comes to development of things like physics and whatnot. Give it a break. If you don't like it, fine, but it just doesn't seem smart to call a game that a site is build around
"not good at ALL" 
Well I didn't mean it that way. What I meant to say was, BF 2142's gameplay is more realistic and I think just better. Like Tean said, SWBF 2 is more of an arcade type game. Pandemic was not trying to compete with BF2142 nor are they made by the same person. If they were the game would be a whole lot different. So is this case this topic is pointless. It might have a point is the two games were competitors and there was something going on between the two, Pandemic had other thoughts for Battlefront 2. The two are un - related in almost every way except that they are two Sci - Fi shooters.